Comparing Anne of Green Gables to Anne with an E and other adaptations

 I first read the Anne of Green Gables series when I was a child. I reread the series aloud to two of my siblings as a teen and read some of it to my own kids as well. One thing I always loved about Anne was how she was ever curious and inventive. I also liked that she tried to help others and accepted them without judgment. That is why I think Anne with an E is the best adaptation because it really captures what her character was like even if it changed certain parts of the story.

Anne with an E is a modern adaptation (not set in modern times) which adds things that wouldn't have been possible to explore in a series written at the time Anne of Green Gables was first written. Anne with an E does a good job of highlighting Anne's past trauma before coming to Green Gables. It differs from the books in several ways. The first major diversion is added for dramatic effect (which I didn't like because I rarely like it when they change the story for purely dramatic reasons), it is them sending Anne back to the orphanage and Matthew needing to go after her once Marilla realizes that Anne did not (in fact) take her brooch. In the books it was much less dramatic, Marilla just banning Anne from going to the ice cream social and making her stay in her room.

The major changes that I liked revolved around including LGBT issues and issues of class and race which would have existed at the time but not been talked about. In Anne of Green Gables, Diana's great aunt is rich and eccentric and crochety. In Anne with an E she is all of those things, but also gay. It was so well written, and so in keeping with the spirit of her character that it made me doubt my own memory about the actual books not containing even a hint of this aspect of her character. I know for a fact that the books did not contain Anne learning of this or anything like that (which happened in the series). The fact that Anne is so open to and accepting of Aunt Josephine even after learning this was so in character for her that I loved it even more.

Another major change was the inclusion of  Ka'Kwet who belongs to an indigenous tribe that lives nearby Avonlea. This wouldn't have been included in a major publication at the time Anne of Green Gables was written, but the indigenous peoples of Canada and their struggles would have been happening and it is really good to see a work that was previously entirely anglo-centric being adapted to include people of color. Also, the entire struggle with her being sent off to a conversion school is in keeping with the policies of the day when dealing with indigenous peoples. There is also a side story with Gilbert befriending a black man after his father's death when he goes off the sea. This is an entirely Anne with an E storyline as Gilbert and Anne exchanged letters because she was working while he attended medical school (see Anne of Windy Poplars) not because he went to sea following his father's death. Even so, I liked this development of Gilbert Blythe because the one in the book isn't really very well developed, especially not compared to Anne or even several other characters around her.

One character that hasn't really been adapted into any of the movies or television series that I've seen is Lavender Lewis. I really liked her character when I read the book (Anne of Avonlea) and I have always been disappointed not to see her character appear in any adaptations of the series.

I have also seen the movies starring Megan Follows as Anne. The series of three movies stays pretty true to the story for the first two movies changing only a few details and skipping a great deal of both Anne of Avonlea and Anne of the Island by combining them into one movie, but it goes an entirely different direction with the third movie. It seems to have moved the timeline up as the war (which started when Anne's youngest Rilla was a teenager) is already in full swing and Gilbert is fighting. I didn't like this change much. I would have preferred to see Rilla of Ingleside adapted. I loved the books focusing on Anne's children, but especially Rilla of Ingleside. I wish Anne with an E would continue its adaptation after Anne's marriage to Gilbert and follow her children, or that an adaptation would be made that focused solely on the last two books of the series. I can completely see Walter being gay, from the way he is described and his whole tragic story, given that he is Rilla's favorite brother I would say that Rilla possesses a lot of her mother's open-mindedness.

Thanks for reading. Tune in next time when I talk about the BBC adaptation Sherlock as opposed to the original stories by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.

Girl with the Dragon Tattoo: Book/American Film comparison

Steg Larsson's book The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and its two sequels are not for the feint of heart. The books challenge the idea of a female being helpless simply because she is weaker or smaller. From the moment the protagonist of our novels Mikael Blomkvist meets Lizbeth Salandar we the reader can tell she's different. She's brilliant, she's mysterious and she's strong. She's also physically smaller than even the average woman. So today I want to examine what the movie got right and ways in which it messed up in order to wrap everything up neatly.

The characterizations are pretty much spot on for most of the movie. That is, until our protagonist and Lizbeth sleep together. For whatever reason the movie decided that Lizbeth would bare her soul to Mikael after they slept together which she did not do in the books. This is completely out of character for her. In the book series it took lots of working together and him having her back and vice-versa before she revealed anything to him. She wouldn't have become vulnerable just because they had sex and that the movie changed this about her character is a little discomforting to me.

The movie only covers the first book of the series, at the end of which Mikael still knew very little about Lizbeth. He learned that she was a hacker (on his own) and confronted her about it, after which she admitted to it, but apart from that, she's still very mysterious. Even the reader doesn't know much about her character that Mikael doesn't. We do learn that she's resourceful, and that even when victimized, she finds a way to rise above. We also learn that she is willing to do a lot of morally ambiguous things to get where she has to be. After being raped (for instance) she does not kill her rapist, despite considering that as a possibility, because she knows the job of guardian will go to someone else and she sees an opportunity to control her guardian the way he intended to control her so that she finally has control over her own money. The movie did a good job at capturing this aspect of her personality and I love that she's still the one to save Mikael from the killer. I would have loathed the movie if they had made her a damsel in distress.

I also feel like the movie really glossed over the fact that Lizbeth is bi (or pan) sexual in favor of concentrating on her relationship with Mikael. While I believe it does show some of her relationship with the girl that had been her sex buddy before she started working with Mikael, the very act of her opening up to Mikael in the movie changed their relationship. In the books, she sleeps with him on a whim and it is made clear that the act meant more to Mikael than it did to her. She just likes sex. When she is accused of murder in a subsequent book, even Mikael doesn't know if she's innocent (though he wants to believe her and ends up working with her to help prove she wasn't involved). The movie wanted to resolve their relationship right away (presumably because they didn't intend on making the subsequent movies that explained more about her character).

So while I think the American movie adaptation was good. I would definitely say you need to read the books. I've heard that the Swedish movie series is better, that it does a good job of staying faithful to the books, but I don't think I've seen it to be able to make that analysis. For now, if you want the best version of Lizbeth Salander, stick to the books.

Thank you for reading. Tune in next time when I talk about the Anne of Green Gables book series vs. The first movie adaptation series and the series Anne with an E.

Comparing Pride and Prejudice the book with many adaptations I've seen

It is a truth universally acknowledged that Jane Austen was a writing genius. And if you don't get the reference, the first part of that sentence is how Pride and Prejudice begins. But if you don't get that reference, you probably won't be interested in reading the rest of this post, because this is all about that particular story. I have watched three film versions of Pride and Prejudice, one was a mini-series starring Colin Firth as Mr. Darcy one was the Bollywood production Bride and Prejudice, and the other was the newest adaptation with Keira Knightley as Elizabeth Bennet. I will be examining how impressed I was with these adaptations as well as diving into the modernized versions I've seen and the fanfiction adaptation Bridget Jones Diary. I have read the original book through at least twice, I have also gone over certain passages for different classes I took during college, and written a few papers on it. This being said, there may be a few things I misremember since it has been a few years since my last reading and all the films have been viewed over the course of several years as well. So bear with me and if you notice any glaring errors, feel free to address them in the comment section and I'll be sure to fix them.

First, since it is a miniseries instead of a Hollywood film, the Colin Firth adaptation is able to stay fairly true to the original source material. All of the adaptations I'll be examining kept most of the key plot points, Mr. Wickham and his wickedness, Mr. Darcy's clandestine manipulation of the situation allowing what would have been a huge scandal to blow over quickly and saving Elizabeth's entire family from a ruined reputation, The sister element is not present in Bridget Jones Diary to my recollection, but all the other adaptations I'm going to examine have a version of Jane and a version of Lydia who are the most important sisters to the plot. Mary and Kitty are just kind of there, they don't really progress the plot at all. I also don't recall a Mr. Collins-esque character in Bridget Jones diary (correct me if I'm wrong Bridget Jones fans). But Mr. Collins is a part of all the other adaptations if I'm recalling them correctly. The person that Mrs. Bennet is just salivating to matchmake to one of her daughters but who, because of Elizabeth's refusal ends up marrying Elizabeth's best friend Charlotte instead. What each of the stories do differently is mostly in their portrayal of the main characters and in the direction of the action so I'll be examining all of those in my analysis.

In the Colin Firth adaptation, Darcy is shown as being conflicted between his pride and his love for Elizabeth Bennet. We see him agonize after her rebuttal of his proposal and we see him play with his dogs. These are character building moments. In the original novel. Jane Austen writes from Elizabeth's perspective. We cannot see Darcy's attraction to her until she is able to see it but we see her attraction to him before she does. The letter changes everything. In the Keira Knightly version, we see the passion between them in the rain scene where he declares his undying love for her and an argument fraught with sexual tension. In fact, all the scenes of Darcy and Elizabeth together, even when she is cutting through him with her sharp wit, are charged with that same tension. The director did a fantastic job of showing this especially in the dance scene where everyone else fades away and the two of them are the only ones left showing that they are so focused on each other that it's as if the rest of the ballroom doesn't exist. I also loved the portrayal of Mr. Collins in this one simply because he is just as slimy and unlikeable as he is in the books, with an added layer of awkwardness after he gets married (stumbling on the word intercourse while exchanging a glace with Charlotte, for instance).

Of course, no analysis of the Pride and Prejudice series starring Colin Firth would be complete without talking about the swimming scene. This scene only exists in this version. It is not pertinent to the story, it simply serves as eye candy for the female audience, but I love it all the same. In it, Darcy goes for a swim at a pond on his estate and Elizabeth and her family are touring the estate at the time and he sees them right after while his shirt still clings to his wet body. The sexual tension in this scene is almost as high as it is in the Keira Knightly scene at the pavilion where Darcy proposes for the first time.

One of the things I really enjoyed about the book, and one that is best captured in the Colin Firth version, is the dialog. I really loved Elizabeth Bennet's quick wit and her exchanges with all the other characters. I think, however, the character of Mr. Bennet is best captured by Donald Sutherland (such an amazing actor) in the Keira Knightly version. My favorite exchange between the two is included in both adaptations. It is where Mrs. Bennet is in a dither about Elizabeth turning down Mr. Collins' proposal (since all she can think about is marrying her daughters off without a single thought to whether or not they'll be happy) Mrs. Bennet seeks her husbands aid in convincing his daughter to accept the proposal. His response is epic: "From this day, you shall be ever estranged from one of your parents. Your mother will not see you again if you do not accept Mr. Collins, and I will not see you again if you do." The Keira Knightly version does this scene beautifully, setting it in the woods where Mr. Bennet is going on a walk when approached by Mrs. Bennet. Keira Knightly does a fantastic job of seeming anxious when Mr. Bennet starts talking and then throwing her arms about him in her relief. It's just so well done. This is my favorite scene with the two of them.

So now that we've explored both actual adaptations of Pride and Prejudice, let's turn our attention to the Bollywood production and the fanfic. I loved the Bollywood decision to make it so the scandal of the young Ms. Darcy's involvement with Wickham went beyond just eloping. In the Bollywood version, Wickham got Darcy's teenage sister pregnant and she had to have an abortion. This is as modernized as I've ever seen the scandal. I also love that Darcy finds Wickham in a theater and attacks him in front of a movie that's playing. The songs were good, but some of them did distract me from the overall story. I liked the dynamic of a culture clash between the American Darcy and the Indian Lalita (the Elizabeth Bennet character). In this version, however, the main character is there to witness Darcy's interference with Wickham and her sister, she does not hear about it second hand as she does in the original story.

Finally, in the fanfic Bridget Jones Diary. Mark Darcy is a stuffy lawyer type and the Wickham character is Bridget's boss Daniel Cleaver. The misunderstanding of why Darcy and Cleaver hate each other is (just like in Pride and Prejudice) facilitated by Daniel's lying to Bridget about something by making himself out to be a victim and painting Darcy as the bad guy. Eventually, Bridget learns the truth, but not from Darcy because it's too personal for him. In Bridget Jones' Diary, it is not Darcy's sister who Cleaver has wronged, but Darcy himself by Cleaver's cuckolding him on his wedding night. Bridget learns of this from a third party who knows about the situation. There is also an awesome Mark Darcy and Daniel Cleaver fist fight after Cleaver says something to make him snap. The sister scandal in Bridget Jones' Diary is not actually Bridget's sister, but her mother who runs away from home and gets into financial straights thanks to her new boyfriend swindling her. Darcy ends up helping her out on the DL because that's just who he is after a distraught Bridget turns to him for comfort about the situation.

I liked all the versions I've seen and though I would never say any of them are "as good" as the book, they all have their own charms. Every adaptation that I've seen did some things better. The Colin Firth version was the most faithful to the original story, the Keira Knightly version had the most passion, the Bollywood production was the most modern while staying with the original story and the fanfic was the most creative adaptation. I loved them all, but I'll continue to read the book because there's nothing like the original story and Jane Austen does it so well.

Thanks for reading. Tune in next time for my analysis of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo book series vs. the American movie version.

A Silent Voice: Manga/Film comparison

 So I've been thinking recently about how I like to read, I have all these books and manga that I've read and also watched the film or anime counterparts and I thought it would be interesting to compare what I thought of each. The one I've chosen for today's analysis is a movie I've watched several times, and even though I've only read the manga through once and it was a while ago. That being said, let's dive right in.

So the first thing I want to say is that the manga is pretty long so it was only going to cover everything if they had made it into a series and they made a movie instead. It was natural that some things would get cut. The first thing on the chopping block was most of the childhood bullying. The manga really shows Shoya's state of mind throughout. How he's trying to alleviate his boredom and show off to his "friends" who join in as well and then throw him under the bus when shit hits the fan. The movie relegates all of this to the opening montage, which is a perfectly fine artistic choice. The bullying is the backdrop, the main focus is the affect it had on the kids after they got older anyway.

Next, a lot of the friendship with Tomohiro gets cut, but enough of it is left that you get a good sense that this is Shoya's first friendship since he was like ten and he doesn't want to mess it up. I really loved that they kept the x's on the faces and the camera angled to show that he's always looking down was a good choice as well. I also really love the musical accompaniment they picked for the most emotional moments because it really fit in nicely.

The only thing they cut, which I understand they didn't have time for, that I would have liked them to keep because it had such an impact on me, was the movie. You see, in the manga, the friend group that starts to form around Shoya and Shouko decides to make a movie. The movie requires them to talk to the elementary school teacher at the school where Shoya bullied Shouko and you see just how much the teacher's attitude factored into the hostile environment where the kids thought it was no big deal to bully one another for being different. Shoya finds out just how devastating this can be when he becomes the target instead of the bully, but you also see something else and that is the development and exposure of Toshi as a character. In the movie, his character is kind of a backdrop character, necessary only as the fuse that ignites Miki Kawai to show her true colors since she has a crush on him. In the manga, he is a staunch protector of bullied kids because he endured that as a child and he goes off on the teacher for allowing it to happen in his school. When he finds out that Shoya used to be a bully, that sets him off which is the beginning of the friend group unraveling. It is also the movie that eventually brings the friend group back together as Shouko gets everyone back together to finish it and they show it to Shoya at the cultural festival as proof that they all love him. 

The other thing they downsized for the movie was the extent of Ueno's animosity towards Shouko, especially after the suicide attempt. In the manga, Ueno keeps Shouko from visiting Shoya in the hospital when he won't wake up. She physically baracades the door so Shouko can't get in. Some of this animosity is shown in the movie because the rooftop attack scene is kept in, but the majority of it, and the final culmination of Shouko actually getting Ueno to agree to help with the film is a progression that I liked seeing in the manga. 

Overall I would probably rate both of them a 10/10, both were very emotional. I also have to say that this is one of the handful of anime movies I can watch in dub because they did such a wonderful job with the VA for the dub. I still prefer hearing the original Japanese, maybe someday I'll be able to read the manga in the original Japanese script as well.

Well that has been it for this episode. Hope you enjoyed and tune in next time when we discuss one of my favorite authors Jane Austen and the many adaptations of Pride and Prejudice that I've seen.